{"id":606,"date":"2012-08-24T07:49:58","date_gmt":"2012-08-24T07:49:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.marijuana.net\/?p=19669"},"modified":"2012-08-24T07:49:58","modified_gmt":"2012-08-24T07:49:58","slug":"medical-marijuana-industry-news-august-24-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/medical-marijuana-industry-news-august-24-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Medical Marijuana Industry News August 24, 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"wp_fb_like_button\" style=\"margin:5px 0 5px 5px;float:right;height:100px;\"><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/medical-marijuana-industry-news-august-24-2012\/\" send=\"true\" layout=\"standard\" width=\"450\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\" action=\"like\" colorscheme=\"light\"><\/fb:like><\/div><p><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"276\" height=\"183\" src=\"http:\/\/www.marijuana.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/case-dismissed.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"case dismissed\" title=\"case dismissed\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-19673\" href=\"http:\/\/www.marijuana.net\/news-and-articles\/medical-marijuana-industry-news-august-24-2012\/attachment\/case-dismissed\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-19673\" title=\"case dismissed\" src=\"http:\/\/www.marijuana.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/case-dismissed-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a>Court Ruling Could Reverse Dispensary Bans in California\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Los Angeles City Council has come under much scrutiny after its controversial decision to ban all medical marijuana dispensaries.\u00a0 Many even wondered if they had the legal authority to even enact such a law with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opposingviews.com\/i\/health\/addiction\/california-appeals-court-medical-marijuana-dispensaries-are-legal\" target=\"_blank\">a decision by California\u2019s 2<sup>nd<\/sup> District of Appeals <\/a>stating that dispensaries could not banned.\u00a0 The city decided to move forward with the ban even though it was clear they would have to spend considerable tax dollars defending their ill advised legal decision.\u00a0 A lawsuit has already been filed by the \u201cPatient Care Alliance\u201d challenging the ban.\u00a0 Additionally, <a href=\"http:\/\/safeaccessnow.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Americans For Safe Access<\/a> have been in the process of collecting the necessary signatures to get a ballot initiative off the ground that would present residents with a chance to overturn the ban themselves.\u00a0 The lawsuit and the ballot initiative may not even be necessary in the end as we recently learned that the court case<a href=\"http:\/\/thepuffingtonhost.com\/tag\/pack-v-long-beach\/\" target=\"_blank\"> Pack V. Long Beach<\/a> was thrown out by the California Supreme Court.\u00a0 Previously, the decision in Pack V. Long Beach ruled that marijuana dispensaries could be banned on the basis that medical marijuana is not permitted by federal law.\u00a0 As a result, municipalities such as L.A. and Long Beach used the decision to ban dispensaries.\u00a0 The state supreme court ruled that since the municipalities have abandoned their federal argument in the recent bans, then everything pertaining to Pack V. Long Beach has been invalidated.\u00a0 Joe Elford of Americans for Safe Access applauded the decision and said &#8220;The California Supreme Court has essentially pulled out the rug from under local officials who have used the\u00a0Pack\u00a0decision to deny access to medical marijuana for thousands of patients across the state.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.opposingviews.com\/i\/society\/drug-law\/pack-v-long-beach-medical-marijuana-dispensary-ban-case-thrown-out\" target=\"_blank\">For more on this decision click here<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>NAACP Backs Marijuana Legalization Effort In Colorado\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A group familiar with social struggles announced its support for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.regulatemarijuana.org\/s\/regulate-marijuana-alcohol-act-2012\" target=\"_blank\">Amendment 64<\/a> and Colorado\u2019s marijuana legalization efforts.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.naacp.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">The NAACP<\/a> (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) was formed in 1909 setting out on a mission \u201cto ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate race-based discrimination.\u201d\u00a0 The oldest civil rights organization is now seeking passage of Amendment 64.\u00a0 However, their support is not entirely linked to the right to smoke marijuana itself as the group is also very much concerned with the disproportionate numbers of African Americans being jailed for cannabis related convictions.\u00a0 Rosemarie Harris Lytle, president of the NAACP\u2019s Colorado branch said &#8220;Marijuana prohibition policy does more harm to our communities than good.\u00a0 &#8220;That is why we have endorsed Amendment 64 which presents a more effective and socially responsible approach to how Colorado addresses the adult use of marijuana.&#8221;\u00a0 Arrests numbers by race are discouraging across the country but Colorado seems to have an even greater racial disparity in marijuana arrests than other areas of the country.\u00a0 In Colorado, African Americans make up 4% of population but make up 9% of marijuana possession arrests and 22% of sale and cultivation charges.\u00a0 In Denver the numbers are even more alarming as 11% of Denver\u2019s population is African American even as they represent 31.5% of marijuana possession arrests.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2012\/08\/23\/naacp-backs-marijuana-leg_n_1824351.html\" target=\"_blank\">For more on this story click here<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Medical Marijuana Makes Arkansas Ballot for November Election\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Activists in Arkansas faced a major setback when they were unable to deliver enough votes to get medical marijuana to the ballot earlier this summer.\u00a0 However, a renewed effort has been successful with 74,406 signatures being submitted this time.\u00a0 The number is higher than the 62,507 needed.\u00a0 However ballot initiatives often see a significant number of signatures disqualified.\u00a0 This was not the case in Arkansas as the Arkansas Secretary of State said earlier this week that &#8220;Our office verified over 69,000 signatures for <a href=\"http:\/\/arcompassion.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Arkansans for Compassionate Care<\/a>. They will be certified to the ballot.&#8221;\u00a0 If residents approve the measure Arkansas will join the <a href=\"http:\/\/medicalmarijuana.procon.org\/view.resource.php?resourceID=000881\" target=\"_blank\">17 other states<\/a> (and Washington D.C.) that permit medical marijuana.\u00a0 They would, however, become the first southern state to start a medical marijuana program.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ozarksfirst.com\/fulltext?nxd_id=691712\" target=\"_blank\">For more on this article click here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"276\" height=\"183\" src=\"http:\/\/www.marijuana.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/case-dismissed.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"case dismissed\" title=\"case dismissed\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-19673\" href=\"http:\/\/www.marijuana.net\/news-and-articles\/medical-marijuana-industry-news-august-24-2012\/attachment\/case-dismissed\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-19673\" title=\"case dismissed\" src=\"http:\/\/www.marijuana.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/case-dismissed-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a>Court Ruling Could Reverse Dispensary Bans in California\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Los Angeles City Council has come under much scrutiny after its controversial decision to ban all medical marijuana dispensaries.\u00a0 Many even wondered if they had the legal authority to even enact such a law with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opposingviews.com\/i\/health\/addiction\/california-appeals-court-medical-marijuana-dispensaries-are-legal\" target=\"_blank\">a decision by California\u2019s 2<sup>nd<\/sup> District of Appeals <\/a>stating that dispensaries could not banned.\u00a0 The city decided to move forward with the ban even though it was clear they would have to spend considerable tax dollars defending their ill advised legal decision.\u00a0 A lawsuit has already been filed by the \u201cPatient Care Alliance\u201d challenging the ban.\u00a0 Additionally, <a href=\"http:\/\/safeaccessnow.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Americans For Safe Access<\/a> have been in the process of collecting the necessary signatures to get a ballot initiative off the ground that would present residents with a chance to overturn the ban themselves.\u00a0 The lawsuit and the ballot initiative may not even be necessary in the end as we recently learned that the court case<a href=\"http:\/\/thepuffingtonhost.com\/tag\/pack-v-long-beach\/\" target=\"_blank\"> Pack V. Long Beach<\/a> was thrown out by the California Supreme Court.\u00a0 Previously, the decision in Pack V. Long Beach ruled that marijuana dispensaries could be banned on the basis that medical marijuana is not permitted by federal law.\u00a0 As a result, municipalities such as L.A. and Long Beach used the decision to ban dispensaries.\u00a0 The state supreme court ruled that since the municipalities have abandoned their federal argument in the recent bans, then everything pertaining to Pack V. Long Beach has been invalidated.\u00a0 Joe Elford of Americans for Safe Access applauded the decision and said &#8220;The California Supreme Court has essentially pulled out the rug from under local officials who have used the\u00a0Pack\u00a0decision to deny access to medical marijuana for thousands of patients across the state.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.opposingviews.com\/i\/society\/drug-law\/pack-v-long-beach-medical-marijuana-dispensary-ban-case-thrown-out\" target=\"_blank\">For more on this decision click here<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>NAACP Backs Marijuana Legalization Effort In Colorado\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A group familiar with social struggles announced its support for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.regulatemarijuana.org\/s\/regulate-marijuana-alcohol-act-2012\" target=\"_blank\">Amendment 64<\/a> and Colorado\u2019s marijuana legalization efforts.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.naacp.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">The NAACP<\/a> (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) was formed in 1909 setting out on a mission \u201cto ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate race-based discrimination.\u201d\u00a0 The oldest civil rights organization is now seeking passage of Amendment 64.\u00a0 However, their support is not entirely linked to the right to smoke marijuana itself as the group is also very much concerned with the disproportionate numbers of African Americans being jailed for cannabis related convictions.\u00a0 Rosemarie Harris Lytle, president of the NAACP\u2019s Colorado branch said &#8220;Marijuana prohibition policy does more harm to our communities than good.\u00a0 &#8220;That is why we have endorsed Amendment 64 which presents a more effective and socially responsible approach to how Colorado addresses the adult use of marijuana.&#8221;\u00a0 Arrests numbers by race are discouraging across the country but Colorado seems to have an even greater racial disparity in marijuana arrests than other areas of the country.\u00a0 In Colorado, African Americans make up 4% of population but make up 9% of marijuana possession arrests and 22% of sale and cultivation charges.\u00a0 In Denver the numbers are even more alarming as 11% of Denver\u2019s population is African American even as they represent 31.5% of marijuana possession arrests.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2012\/08\/23\/naacp-backs-marijuana-leg_n_1824351.html\" target=\"_blank\">For more on this story click here<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Medical Marijuana Makes Arkansas Ballot for November Election\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Activists in Arkansas faced a major setback when they were unable to deliver enough votes to get medical marijuana to the ballot earlier this summer.\u00a0 However, a renewed effort has been successful with 74,406 signatures being submitted this time.\u00a0 The number is higher than the 62,507 needed.\u00a0 However ballot initiatives often see a significant number of signatures disqualified.\u00a0 This was not the case in Arkansas as the Arkansas Secretary of State said earlier this week that &#8220;Our office verified over 69,000 signatures for <a href=\"http:\/\/arcompassion.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Arkansans for Compassionate Care<\/a>. They will be certified to the ballot.&#8221;\u00a0 If residents approve the measure Arkansas will join the <a href=\"http:\/\/medicalmarijuana.procon.org\/view.resource.php?resourceID=000881\" target=\"_blank\">17 other states<\/a> (and Washington D.C.) that permit medical marijuana.\u00a0 They would, however, become the first southern state to start a medical marijuana program.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ozarksfirst.com\/fulltext?nxd_id=691712\" target=\"_blank\">For more on this article click here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[374,165,221,222,189,375,52,166,376,377,378,184,168,56,9,379,51,341,70,380,381,1,3,382,61],"tags":[2952,2743,2799,2800,2767,2953,2632,2744,2954,2955,2956,2762,2746,2636,2957,2631,2919,5,2958,2959,2960,6],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cannitrol.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}