Brown University
Study Indicates That Legal Marijuana Not Increasing Teen Use
Convenience stores sell cigarettes and beer but 7-11 has not been blamed for teenage smoking and drinking. Availability is not the only criteria when assessing use. Even though teens may walk by or even into establishments with these products, there are fail safes for preventing the sale to minors. Most notably is an ID and harsh penalties for adults who provide these products to under aged individuals.
While hard data is hard to come by for alcohol consumption during the prohibition era (bootleggers did not exactly provide itemized lists of sales to the IRS) most experts agree that a similar level of drinking occurred before during and after prohibition. It appears a parallel is emerging with marijuana prohibition in the United States. A recent study conducted at Brown University by Dr. Esther Choo has shown no connection between legalized marijuana states and increased teenage use. Dr. Choo analyzed and compared data between Rhode Island (where medical marijuana is legal) and Massachusetts (a state without a medical marijuana program). She selected these states specifically because of their socio/economic/ethnic similarities. The rate of teenage use was unchanged in Rhode Island and was almost identical to Massachusetts.
Dr. Choo had this to say about medical marijuana patients “ Whether they are taking it for pain or for vomiting control or appetite, this is not a group we think of as superinspiring for young people to take up their drug pattern. It’s an older population who is generally very ill.” Basically, people using marijuana for back pain and nausea may not be the hip group that will motivate teens to smoke cannabis. Also, like alcohol and cigarettes, there are safety mechanisms in place to prevent access by teens. Most medical marijuana facilities are very aggressive in preventing individuals without prescriptions and cards from even entering their offices. Legalization alone does not permit unadulterated access to marijuana.
This could be a rally point for advocates. As urban myths about marijuana fall one by one, critics are going to have to start accepting the hard data. This is not Dr. Choo’s first study in this area. In actuality, this study confirms her findings in a 2006 study. Dr. Choo says she will move on to analyzing data from other states. If the trend of her findings continues, the teenage argument will take a serious hit and another barrier will be removed that prevents a truthful academic conversation about marijuana.